IBOV 166,783.57 ▼ 0.09% IPSA 11,148.13 ▲ 0.96% IPC MEX 64,152.21 ▼ 0.38% MERVAL 2,947,349 ▼ 1.77% COLCAP 2,452.46 — 0.00% BVL PERÚ 58,334.31 ▲ 0.12% USD/BRL5.20▼ 0.02% USD/MXN17.05▲ 0.09% USD/CLP915.68▲ 0.07% USD/COP3,132▲ 0.06% USD/PEN3.37▲ 0.02% USD/ARS1,488▼ 0.03% USD/UYU40.33▲ 2.10% USD/PYG5,997▲ 1.94% USD/BOB11.50▲ 0.28% USD/DOP58.55▲ 1.35% USD/CRC446.12— 0.00% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.30% USD/HNL26.79▲ 1.71% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.81% USD/VES771.38▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.73▲ 1.37% EUR/BRL6.02▼ 0.30% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 166,783.57 ▼ 0.09% IPSA 11,148.13 ▲ 0.96% IPC MEX 64,152.21 ▼ 0.38% MERVAL 2,947,349 ▼ 1.77% COLCAP 2,452.46 — 0.00% BVL PERÚ 58,334.31 ▲ 0.12% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Hey Maconheiro!

By · March 1, 2011 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

Opinion, by Samantha Barthelemy

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – Why is it that when talking about the “problem of drugs” we are quick to point the finger at those “evil drug traffickers” of the notorious Comando Vermelho (Red Command), Terceiro Comando (Third Command) and Amigos dos Amigos (Friends of Friends) and assume that by “dealing” with them we will resolve Rio’s (in)security dilemma?

Samantha Barthelemy, Carioca in New York specializing in International Security Policy, Brazilian Studies and Communications.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

This is not an argument for or against the legalization of maconha (marijuana) – which in and of itself would solve absolutely nothing – but a call for an alternative to the repression, extremism and sometimes inefficiency characteristic of Rio de Janeiro’s security policies.

It is Carioca practice to face a problem only when there is no other way around it and, when doing so, covering up symptoms rather than addressing root causes. The government’s crack down on drug trafficking and related violence is not much different. After three decades of neglect: warn, invade, expel, occupy and “pacify.”

In the pre-World Cup/Olympics UPP-hype our leaders proudly claim to be “eradicating drug traffic,” but I am not quite sure just how that will be achieved.

Have they finally understood public security is not dissociable from education policies? Does not seem like it. Or, do they honestly believe drug trafficking is the only facet of Rio de Janeiro’s high rates of criminality?

Here’s a thought. It seems it is not yet in the jeitinho brasileiro (Brazilian way), but why not try to invest in preventive, rather than simply repressive, policies? Why not educate the populace on drug consumption? Or on the perils of drug consumption? Why not expand access to rehabilitation? Why not widely disseminate education campaigns?

Such measures cost less lives and money. It is not enough to blame, threat, repress and punish. It is not enough to decriminalize and tax either. But it may be a start to educate.

Education is not simply for the economically underprivileged.

It is quite comfortable to sit at home with middle and upper class friends and call for the “bombing of Rocinha” (yes, I heard that). It is quite another thing to acknowledge that the maconha enjoyed at the parties and beaches comes from the same evil place where children as young as eleven serve as soldiers for drug trafficking gangs.

It is nice to see Cariocas taking to the streets in marijuana marches, as they have done for the past six years, chanting to “sou maconheiro, com muito orgulho, com muito amor” (“I’m a weed smoker with much pride, with much love”). It would be even nicer to see acknowledgment that their “harmless actions” have perverse repercussions.

True, the government should not decide what you can or cannot do inside your own home. Unfortunately, marijuana is not legal (yet), so if what you do in your privacy contributes to Rio’s record high rates of violence, it becomes a lot of people’s business.


——–
A Belgian-Brazilian native of Rio de Janeiro and former United Nations journalist, Samantha Barthelemy is a dual degree Masters of International Affairs student with Columbia University and the Paris Institute of Political Studies, specializing in International Security Policy, Brazilian Studies and Communications.
http://samanthabarthelemy.blogspot.com/

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.