IBOV 175,710.05 ▼ 0.51% IPC MEX 69,711.87 ▲ 0.35% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.34▼ 0.11% USD/MXN18.65▼ 0.12% USD/CLP983.77▼ 0.54% USD/COP3,144▼ 0.17% USD/PEN3.45▲ 0.03% USD/ARS1,538— 0.00% USD/UYU40.21▲ 3.50% USD/PYG5,803▲ 4.05% USD/BOB11.97▲ 4.12% USD/DOP61.24▲ 1.90% USD/CRC451.24▲ 2.31% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.15% USD/HNL26.87▲ 0.25% USD/NIO36.62▼ 0.02% USD/VES885.90▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.69▲ 2.51% USD/TTD6.71▲ 1.96% EUR/BRL5.95▼ 0.85% BRENT 109.58 ▼ 5.38% WTI 100.12 ▼ 1.61% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.65 ▲ 2.24% GOLD 4,073 ▲ 0.85% SILVER 54.49 ▲ 0.70% SOY 1,250 ▲ 0.70% CORN 450.25 ▼ 1.04% WHEAT 614.75 ▼ 0.20% COFFEE 294.35 ▼ 2.19% SUGAR 19.26 ▲ 0.84% ORANGE JUICE 143.20 ▲ 5.45% COTTON 77.90 ▼ 1.47% COCOA 5,581 ▲ 1.66% BEEF 230.73 ▲ 0.33% CATTLE 346.40 ▼ 1.00% LITHIUM 62.43 ▲ 1.89% PETR4 53.31 ▼ 1.06% VALE3 62.88 ▼ 2.33% ITUB4 41.42 ▼ 0.67% BBDC4 15.69 ▼ 1.63% ABEV3 15.40 ▲ 0.20% BBAS3 17.59 ▲ 0.69% B3SA3 15.27 ▲ 1.33% WEGE3 45.78 ▲ 2.81% PRIO3 69.21 ▼ 2.71% SUZB3 47.14 ▼ 0.55% RENT3 31.14 ▼ 1.67% AZZA3 16.72 ▲ 1.15% CSAN3 2.69 ▼ 2.89% RAIZ4 0.34 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.22 ▼ 3.48% GMAT3 3.74 ▲ 2.19% PSSA3 47.75 ▼ 0.89% CVCB3 0.98 — 0.00% POSI3 3.56 ▼ 0.84% SLCE3 16.97 ▼ 2.75% NATU3 5.68 ▼ 3.89% BRKM5 3.80 ▲ 19.50% RANI3 7.34 ▼ 0.54% CSNA3 4.76 ▼ 4.99% IBOV 175,710.05 ▼ 0.51% IPC MEX 69,711.87 ▲ 0.35% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.34 ▼ 1.32% USD/MXN 18.69 ▲ 0.62% USD/CLP 983.47 ▼ 0.57% USD/COP 3,149 ▲ 3.06% USD/PEN 3.45 ▲ 0.17% USD/ARS 1,537 ▼ 0.28% USD/UYU 40.21 ▲ 3.57% USD/PYG 5,803 ▲ 3.78% USD/BOB 11.97 ▲ 4.93% USD/DOP 60.54 ▲ 1.83% USD/CRC 451.24 ▲ 2.13% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.23% USD/HNL 26.87 ▲ 3.37% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 2.81% USD/VES 885.08 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.69 ▲ 2.63% USD/TTD 6.71 ▲ 2.07% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 7.53% BRENT 109.58 ▼ 5.38% WTI 100.12 ▼ 1.61% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.65 ▲ 2.24% GOLD 4,073 ▲ 0.85% SILVER 54.49 ▲ 0.70% SOY 1,250 ▲ 0.70% CORN 450.25 ▼ 1.04% WHEAT 614.75 ▼ 0.20% COFFEE 294.35 ▼ 2.19% SUGAR 19.26 ▲ 0.84% ORANGE JUICE 143.20 ▲ 5.45% COTTON 77.90 ▼ 1.47% COCOA 5,581 ▲ 1.66% BEEF 230.73 ▲ 0.33% CATTLE 346.40 ▼ 1.00% LITHIUM 62.43 ▲ 1.89% PETR4 53.31 ▼ 1.06% VALE3 62.88 ▼ 2.33% ITUB4 41.42 ▼ 0.67% BBDC4 15.69 ▼ 1.63% ABEV3 15.40 ▲ 0.20% BBAS3 17.59 ▲ 0.69% B3SA3 15.27 ▲ 1.33% WEGE3 45.78 ▲ 2.81% PRIO3 69.21 ▼ 2.71% SUZB3 47.14 ▼ 0.55% RENT3 31.14 ▼ 1.67% AZZA3 16.72 ▲ 1.15% CSAN3 2.69 ▼ 2.89% RAIZ4 0.34 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.22 ▼ 3.48% GMAT3 3.74 ▲ 2.19% PSSA3 47.75 ▼ 0.89% CVCB3 0.98 — 0.00% POSI3 3.56 ▼ 0.84% SLCE3 16.97 ▼ 2.75% NATU3 5.68 ▼ 3.89% BRKM5 3.80 ▲ 19.50% RANI3 7.34 ▼ 0.54% CSNA3 4.76 ▼ 4.99%
since 2009
Wednesday, October 28, 2026

PT History Repeats Itself

By · June 14, 2011 · 3 min read

Opinion, by Samantha Barthelemy

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – This has been a turbulent month for Dilma Rousseff’s government. As commented on by the Curmudgeon, former Chief of Staff and “de facto Prime Minister” Antonio Palocci, the president’s right-hand man, increased his net worth by some R$20 million between 2006 and 2010, when he was a federal congressman.

Samantha Barthelemy, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, News
Samantha Barthelemy, Carioca specializing in education and public security policies and communications.
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Without any credible explanation for the sudden accession of wealth “from political consultancy” (not that we really expect one), the Palocci affair is nearing a pretty anti-climatic and all too familiar ending.

In 2005, then former president Lula’s Finance Minister, Palocci found himself fending off corruption claims and friendly fire. He was accused of illegally fueling money to the Workers’ Party (PT), as both mayor of São Paulo’s Ribeirão Preto and as Lula’s campaign chief in the 2002 elections.

Palocci fell in early 2006 because of his office’s alleged involvement in the illegal disclosure of payments to a bank account belonging to Francenildo dos Santos Costa, a witness against Palocci in a corruption scandal.

The sacking caused Lula’s government some pains, especially since investors had learned to place much confidence in Palocci’s cautious fiscal and monetary policies.

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Argentina's stocks fall 2.4% as the Fed decides today”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

But the bad guy was out of the big picture – temporarily. Palocci remained influential with investors and within the ruling Workers’ Party and (surprise!) in January 2011 became the newly elected president’s Chief of Staff.

All seemed to be forgiven and forgotten, as tradition dictates in Brazilian politics. Or maybe the PT’s bigger scandal (read Mensalão) forced out enough bad apples that Palocci was suddenly seen as perfect for the job.

Given an even more powerful position than the one he held under Lula, Palocci stirred big trouble, again. Once expected to tame Rousseff’s unwieldy coalition, he has now stirred the government into a frenzy.

In a misguided attempt to calm the powercats, Rousseff granted concessions to coalition partners and opposition members on the new Forestry Code and the anti-homophobia bill pending in Congress. It is not exactly working. Accused of influence-peddling, and “exonerated” by the attorney-general’s ruling that there is no “evidence of wrongdoing,” Rousseff’s right hand man has been asked to step down.

Now the president appointed Gleisi Hoffmann for the position; a newly elected PT senator, another woman, another right hand.

In September 2010, Rousseff’s former-right-hand-woman, Erenice Guerra, resigned as Chief of Staff amidst allegations of participation in a corruption scheme. Before that, Rousseff had held the position since her predecessor, the infamous José Dirceu, was forced to resign for his orchestration of the Congress vote-buying scheme.

Could Hoffmann – the sixth person to occupy the government’s most coveted post in eight years of PT rule – break the “curse?”

Financial markets are reacting more calmly this time than during Palocci’s first defenestration – when the Real fell by 2.7 percent against the dollar and the risk premium on Brazil’s bonds rose 0.6 percent. But Brazilians should be reacting furiously. Or are we giving another Chief of Staff another free pass, again?

———
A Belgian-Brazilian native of Rio de Janeiro and former United Nations journalist, Samantha Barthelemy is a dual degree Masters of International Affairs student with Columbia University and the Paris Institute of Political Studies now living in Rio and specializing in communications, education and public security policy.  http://samanthabarthelemy.blogspot.com

Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief · Editorial standards · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.