By Sarah de Sainte Croix, Senior Contributing Reporter

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – President Dilma Rousseff has called the recent G20 Summit in France a “relative success.” At a press conference in Cannes, she said, “It hasn’t been a complete success, but a relative success, because the eurozone countries have taken a step forward in deciding how to face the crisis. [However] I don’t believe that a meeting can resolve the world’s problems.”

President Dilma Rousseff at the G20 Summit
President Dilma Rousseff at the G20 Summit in Cannes, photo by Roberto Stuckert Filho/ABr.

The issue of the crisis in the eurozone dominated discussions at the meeting, which came to a close on Friday. According to the Brazilian President, all of the participating delegates were concerned about the financial problems facing Europe.

She affirmed this position at the India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) Summit last month, where she urged leaders to “Prevent the crisis spilling over into a global one.”

At the lunch of the Heads of State and Government Leaders at the opening of the G20 Summit on Thursday, she advised that priorities for resolving the crisis must be “leadership, clear vision and speed.” However, by the close of play on Friday she conceded that “The Europeans need more time to decide on their own measures.”

During the summit, Rousseff reaffirmed that Brazil would continue to consider providing financial assistance to Europe on the condition that more details were provided about the implementation of the rescue package.

However, she made it clear that this would not be via direct seeding – but through The International Monetary Fund (IMF) instead, saying, “I don’t have the slightest intention of making any direct contribution to the European Stabilization Fund. Brazil has a mechanism, which is the mechanism that governs international relations, via the Internal Monetary Fund.”

Rousseff and Brazil's Finance Minister Guido Mantega speaking with Korean President Lee Myung-bak in Cannes, photo by Roberto Stuckert Filho/ABr.

Rousseff also confirmed that Brazil would “not oppose” a tax on international financial transactions, known as ‘The Robin Hood Tax,’ which France was keen to support.

The revenue from the tax, which could amount to hundreds of billions of dollars a year, would be used to reduce the deficit of the most problematic of the developed countries, and to help fund development and climate change strategies in lower income countries at a time when fiscal deficits are threatening international aid flows.

One of the goals of the tax was to ensure a minimum global level of income security as specified by the International Labor Organization (ILO), not only for humanitarian reasons, but also to safeguard a minimum level of consumer activity in order to help stabilize global economies.

Rousseff confirmed her support for the theory, recalling the positive socio-economic effects of Brazil’s recent experience of elevating around forty million people into the middle class and to consumer status, saying that supporting the ILO’s income floor is, “Not philanthropy, it’s vital safety net to address the global crisis and which has an unequivocal effect [on economies].”

However, the financial transactions tax met with opposition from the U.S. and the U.K. and it remains to be seen whether or not it will go ahead.

There have been criticisms that the Cannes Action Plan, which summarizes the decisions made during the summit and the action points decided upon for the future, falls short in terms of concrete decisions and ways forward.

On Brazil’s behalf, Rousseff pledged to increase investment in infrastructure and to take “discretionary measures” to support domestic demand, should the crisis significantly worsen.

2 COMMENTS

  1. As a Brasileiro and a Canadian and an internationalist, I congratulate the Brazilian President on her stance on international affairs. She may once have been considered a “Terrorist”, a lefty, and all kinds of other derogatory names, but she has already proven to be a pragmatic Governor of Brazilian people. Not a ruler like Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, or an imbecile like Bolivia’s Evil Morals, she strikes an impressive balance between Capitalism and Progressive Socialism. She is intelligent, speaks well, and not full of criticism like many, plus she is not hard to look at either. It’s been said that one man’s terrorist is another man’s Liberator. Well I have seen how Peru’s Alan Garcia who when first was a so called Communist was elected the second time became what is known as a “Born again Capitalist” and Peru prospered under his second Presidency. I like her as my President, conversely dislike my current Prime Minister who now that he has a majority in the House of Commons, wishes to be a ruler, instead of a Governor. I see for Canada a wake up call and we’ll soon see who really governs Canadians. Canadians. As for Rousseff, Brasil will do well with her as the most influential politician in S.A.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

sixteen − 8 =