IBOV 172,457.76 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,204.98 ▼ 0.84% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.67▲ 0.45% USD/MXN18.52▼ 0.42% USD/CLP994.16▼ 0.13% USD/COP3,302▲ 0.70% USD/PEN3.40▼ 0.16% USD/ARS1,544▼ 0.11% USD/UYU40.59▲ 2.33% USD/PYG6,196▲ 2.33% USD/BOB11.59▼ 0.37% USD/DOP60.59▲ 1.85% USD/CRC442.74▼ 0.10% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 2.06% USD/HNL26.91▲ 2.15% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.73% USD/VES909.35▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.69▲ 1.39% USD/TTD6.75▲ 1.58% EUR/BRL6.25▲ 0.93% BRENT 95.84 ▲ 0.02% WTI 88.56 ▼ 0.20% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.09 ▼ 1.50% GOLD 3,886 ▲ 0.03% SILVER 49.12 ▼ 1.70% SOY 1,232 ▲ 0.37% CORN 445.50 ▲ 0.68% WHEAT 593.25 ▲ 1.54% COFFEE 279.25 ▼ 0.34% SUGAR 18.40 ▲ 0.99% ORANGE JUICE 136.85 ▼ 2.91% COTTON 79.02 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,123 ▲ 1.13% BEEF 224.80 ▲ 2.70% CATTLE 335.35 ▼ 0.10% LITHIUM 58.76 ▼ 1.13% PETR4 45.30 ▲ 1.34% VALE3 63.50 ▼ 0.70% ITUB4 42.27 ▲ 1.42% BBDC4 14.52 ▲ 1.40% ABEV3 15.79 ▲ 0.25% BBAS3 15.10 ▼ 2.45% B3SA3 14.89 ▲ 0.88% WEGE3 51.31 ▼ 0.66% PRIO3 63.30 — 0.00% SUZB3 54.77 ▼ 2.27% RENT3 30.07 ▲ 1.66% AZZA3 15.91 ▼ 5.86% CSAN3 3.10 ▲ 8.77% RAIZ4 20.00 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.56 ▲ 7.11% GMAT3 4.25 ▲ 10.68% PSSA3 46.41 ▲ 1.02% CVCB3 0.83 ▼ 1.19% POSI3 3.15 ▼ 6.53% SLCE3 18.28 ▼ 0.44% NATU3 5.13 ▼ 3.75% BRKM5 3.02 ▼ 1.63% RANI3 8.18 — 0.00% CSNA3 3.72 ▼ 12.06% IBOV 172,457.76 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,204.98 ▼ 0.84% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.67 ▲ 0.45% USD/MXN 18.52 ▼ 0.42% USD/CLP 994.16 ▼ 0.13% USD/COP 3,302 ▲ 0.70% USD/PEN 3.40 ▼ 0.16% USD/ARS 1,544 ▼ 0.11% USD/UYU 40.59 ▲ 2.33% USD/PYG 6,196 ▲ 2.33% USD/BOB 11.59 ▼ 0.37% USD/DOP 60.59 ▲ 1.85% USD/CRC 442.74 ▼ 0.10% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 2.06% USD/HNL 26.91 ▲ 2.15% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 2.73% USD/VES 909.35 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.69 ▲ 1.39% USD/TTD 6.75 ▲ 1.58% EUR/BRL 6.25 ▲ 0.93% BRENT 95.84 ▲ 0.02% WTI 88.56 ▼ 0.20% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.09 ▼ 1.50% GOLD 3,886 ▲ 0.03% SILVER 49.12 ▼ 1.70% SOY 1,232 ▲ 0.37% CORN 445.50 ▲ 0.68% WHEAT 593.25 ▲ 1.54% COFFEE 279.25 ▼ 0.34% SUGAR 18.40 ▲ 0.99% ORANGE JUICE 136.85 ▼ 2.91% COTTON 79.02 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,123 ▲ 1.13% BEEF 224.80 ▲ 2.70% CATTLE 335.35 ▼ 0.10% LITHIUM 58.76 ▼ 1.13% PETR4 45.30 ▲ 1.34% VALE3 63.50 ▼ 0.70% ITUB4 42.27 ▲ 1.42% BBDC4 14.52 ▲ 1.40% ABEV3 15.79 ▲ 0.25% BBAS3 15.10 ▼ 2.45% B3SA3 14.89 ▲ 0.88% WEGE3 51.31 ▼ 0.66% PRIO3 63.30 — 0.00% SUZB3 54.77 ▼ 2.27% RENT3 30.07 ▲ 1.66% AZZA3 15.91 ▼ 5.86% CSAN3 3.10 ▲ 8.77% RAIZ4 20.00 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.56 ▲ 7.11% GMAT3 4.25 ▲ 10.68% PSSA3 46.41 ▲ 1.02% CVCB3 0.83 ▼ 1.19% POSI3 3.15 ▼ 6.53% SLCE3 18.28 ▼ 0.44% NATU3 5.13 ▼ 3.75% BRKM5 3.02 ▼ 1.63% RANI3 8.18 — 0.00% CSNA3 3.72 ▼ 12.06%
since 2009
Saturday, November 14, 2026

Three-Quarters of All Brazilian Municipalities Struggle to Balance Their Accounts

By · · 3 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – Approximately 4,000 Brazilian cities are struggling to balance their accounts. According to the 2019 FIRJAN Index of Fiscal Management (IFGF), prepared by the Federation of Industries of Rio de Janeiro (FIRJAN), the fiscal position of 73.9 percent of all Brazil’s municipalities is considered difficult or critical. Many of them are unable to generate enough revenue to pay for their administrative services and rely on federal transfers to pay municipal workers salaries.

According to the manager of economics at FIRJAN, municipal management is worse than five years ago.
According to the manager of economics at FIRJAN, municipal management is worse than five years ago.
RT
Ask Rio Times
Latin American markets, currencies and companies.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The crisis, which has persisted since 2013, is the result of an equation that combines a lack of autonomy of municipalities to raise their revenues with a growing expenditure on personnel. When the accounts do not balance, the “solution” has been to cut investments and, as a result, compromise the quality of services to the population.

“The municipalities have not yet been able to adapt to this new economic reality in Brazil and are not meeting the population’s wishes and expectations,” says Jonathas Goulart, manager of economics at FIRJAN. According to him, municipal management is worse than five years ago. In the period between 2013 and 2018, personnel expenses grew R$29 billion (US$7.3 billion) while investments dropped R$10 billion.

The FIRJAN study assessed the accounts of 5,337 municipalities in 2018. The data are reported by municipalities by April 30th each year to the National Treasury Secretariat. Only 231 cities failed to submit the data within the deadline – or reported the data with some degree of inconsistency. The FIRJAN index evaluates four indicators in municipal management: Autonomy, Staff Expenses, Liquidity, and Investments.

The worst result was found in the Autonomy Indicator, which measures the city’s potential to generate revenue to cover its expenses. Goulart states that 1,856 municipalities received a zero score in this respect. These municipalities spend, on average, R$4.5 million on administrative structure, but have only R$3 million in local revenues. In total, spending on administrative costs adds up to R$12 billion, while the amount earmarked for health is R$14 billion.

The FIRJAN index shows two different countries with a high percentage of unsustainable municipalities in the North and Northeast regions and a much lower percentage in the South, Southeast, and Center-West Regions.
The FIRJAN index shows high percentage of unsustainable municipalities in Brazil’s North and Northeast regions, but a much lower percentage in the South, Southeast, and Center-West.

Inequality

The FIRJAN executive explains that this index shows two different countries. In Brazil’s Northeast and North, 71 and 45.6 percent of the municipalities are unsustainable. These percentages are much lower in the remainder of Brazil. In the Southeast, 18.6 percent scored zero in this regard; in the Center-West, 16.4 percent; and in the South, only 6.6 percent.

Another indicator showing the fragility of municipal management is Personnel Expenditure. According to the FIRJAN study, half of all Brazilian municipalities are in a critical situation, spending over the cautionary limit of 54 percent of their revenues. There are 2,635 cities in this situation, 821 of which are in violation of the law, with expenditures above 60 percent.

The best result for the cities was the Liquidity index, which shows the difficulty in the volume of unpaid surplus that is left for the following year without cash coverage. Although the result has been better, 1,121 municipalities were on overdraft for lack of budgetary planning.

The investment rate, although not the worst, is what most affects the population’s lives. “What they invest is not even enough to keep up the worn-out structure during the year,” says Goulart. According to FIRJAN, 47 percent of all city governments are in a critical situation in this regard. Among these cities, the mayors invest less than three percent of the budget.

Source: O Estado de S. Paulo

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.