IBOV 166,934.20 ▼ 0.10% IPSA 11,042.67 ▲ 0.39% IPC MEX 64,397.45 ▼ 0.66% MERVAL 2,947,349 ▼ 1.77% COLCAP 2,452.46 ▲ 0.84% BVL PERÚ 58,104.31 ▲ 0.40% USD/BRL5.21▼ 0.19% USD/MXN17.00▼ 0.14% USD/CLP914.45▼ 0.02% USD/COP3,131▼ 0.32% USD/PEN3.36▼ 0.23% USD/ARS1,488▼ 0.02% USD/UYU40.33— 0.00% USD/PYG5,984— 0.00% USD/BOB11.54— 0.00% USD/DOP58.31▼ 0.24% USD/CRC446.12— 0.00% USD/GTQ7.62— 0.00% USD/HNL26.79— 0.00% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES770.61▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.70— 0.00% EUR/BRL6.04▲ 0.74% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 166,934.20 ▼ 0.10% IPSA 11,042.67 ▲ 0.39% IPC MEX 64,397.45 ▼ 0.66% MERVAL 2,947,349 ▼ 1.77% COLCAP 2,452.46 ▲ 0.84% BVL PERÚ 58,104.31 ▲ 0.40% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Monday, August 17, 2026

Brazil Politics - Brazil

Copa America overcomes judicial hurdles and starts on Sunday in Brazil

By · June 11, 2021 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – The Copa America will finally start this Sunday in Brazil, after the Federal Supreme Court (STF) rejected on Thursday three appeals that tried to prevent the South American soccer tournament due to the high incidence of Covid-19 in the country.

The last remaining judicial hurdle to the holding of the tournament fell at the Supreme Court, which in a majority decision ratified the court’s precedents that the last word on sporting events during the pandemic is left to each of the governors of the country’s 27 states.

Copa América in Brazil. (Photo internet reproduction)
Copa América in Brazil. (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

In soccer terms, the ruling was a “rout”, since the first 6 of the 11 members of the court who voted rejected the three lawsuits against the tournament filed by two political parties and a union, thus making the ruling definitive.

These actions alleged the lack of control of the health crisis in a country that already has almost 480,000 deaths and is on the verge of a new pandemic wave as an argument to prevent the holding of the championship, which will bring together ten teams from South America.

The only caveat the court made is that a security protocol be presented, which according to the South American Football Confederation (Conmebol), will be similar to that of other tournaments held in Brazil and the region, which keep the team delegations in rigid “bubbles” and with matches played without spectators.

A RULING SUPPORTED BY COURT CASES THAT BOLSONARO CRITICIZES

The STF decision was supported by the vote of the rapporteur of the case, Justice Carmen Lucia Antunes, who stressed that in previous rulings, the court had already determined that governors and mayors have the power to suspend or release activities in their territories, whether economic, social or even sporting.

In this particular case, Carmen Lucia said that “it is up to them to define, enforce and control the protocols so that there is no ‘copavirus’, which is a source of infections and transmission of new strains.”

He also pointed out that the local authorities, “if such were the case”, could be held responsible in the future “for their administrative decisions” and the consequences they may eventually generate.

The court decisions on which the ruling was based has been condemned on several occasions by Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who accuses governors and mayors of having “destroyed jobs” by suspending economic activities to contain Covid-19.

Ironically, however, that same legal basis now allows holding a tournament that the ultra-right-wing Bolsonaro did not hesitate to accept once Argentina and Colombia desisted from organizing it.

PLAYERS’ TIMID RESISTANCE AND COMPANIES’ FEARS

Last May 31, when Conmebol announced that Brazil would host the Copa America with Bolsonaro’s approval, a wave of criticism was unleashed by Brazilian political sectors, joined by health experts and even many players.

There were contacts between the South American teams, and the Brazil squad even considered not playing. However, these threats did not prosper, and, even with a critical position, all players have decided to participate.

“We are against the organization of the Copa America, but we will never say no to the Brazilian national team,” said players and members of the coaching staff, as reported on Tuesday.

However, criticism of the tournament resonated with some of the companies sponsoring Copa America.

The U.S. multinational Mastercard announced on Tuesday its decision not to promote its products in this edition of the Copa America, as did Ambev, the Brazilian subsidiary of the Belgian multinational AB InBev, the world’s largest brewery.

On Thursday, Diageo, owner of drinks brands such as Johnnie Walker, Smirnoff, and Tanqueray, also made the same statement and, like the other companies, will refrain from promoting its products in this tournament.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.