IBOV 170,840.84 ▼ 0.71% IPC MEX 72,006.05 ▲ 0.16% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.64▲ 1.04% USD/MXN18.59▼ 0.06% USD/CLP994.76▲ 1.22% USD/COP3,305▼ 0.06% USD/PEN3.41▼ 0.09% USD/ARS1,545▲ 0.03% USD/UYU40.52▲ 3.32% USD/PYG6,185▲ 3.33% USD/BOB11.60▲ 0.86% USD/DOP60.46▲ 0.02% USD/CRC445.25▲ 1.62% USD/GTQ7.65▲ 3.31% USD/HNL26.90▲ 3.30% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.73% USD/VES902.19▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.09▲ 2.15% USD/TTD6.71▲ 2.19% EUR/BRL6.23▲ 0.07% BRENT 96.16 ▲ 3.67% WTI 88.95 ▲ 2.80% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.18 ▼ 1.44% GOLD 3,880 ▼ 3.01% SILVER 49.92 ▼ 3.78% SOY 1,220 ▼ 0.77% CORN 442.25 ▼ 1.28% WHEAT 582.50 ▼ 2.84% COFFEE 275.10 ▲ 2.27% SUGAR 18.22 ▼ 1.41% ORANGE JUICE 140.60 ▼ 3.53% COTTON 78.56 ▲ 0.05% COCOA 5,187 ▲ 5.71% BEEF 223.05 ▲ 1.86% CATTLE 331.80 ▼ 0.25% LITHIUM 59.42 ▼ 2.70% PETR4 44.76 ▲ 2.78% VALE3 63.89 ▼ 0.84% ITUB4 41.54 ▼ 0.43% BBDC4 14.24 ▼ 0.63% ABEV3 15.67 ▼ 1.14% BBAS3 15.45 ▼ 8.53% B3SA3 14.77 ▼ 0.20% WEGE3 51.49 ▼ 0.23% PRIO3 63.37 ▲ 3.09% SUZB3 55.80 ▲ 3.72% RENT3 29.66 ▼ 1.92% AZZA3 16.64 ▲ 8.26% CSAN3 2.84 ▼ 6.27% RAIZ4 0.30 ▼ 98.60% PCAR3 2.41 ▼ 5.12% GMAT3 3.89 ▼ 4.66% PSSA3 45.83 ▼ 0.33% CVCB3 0.85 ▼ 1.16% POSI3 3.45 ▲ 3.92% SLCE3 18.26 ▲ 7.10% NATU3 5.34 ▼ 4.98% BRKM5 3.13 ▲ 7.19% RANI3 8.16 ▼ 2.74% CSNA3 4.22 ▼ 6.64% IBOV 170,840.84 ▼ 0.71% IPC MEX 72,006.05 ▲ 0.16% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.64 ▲ 1.04% USD/MXN 18.60 ▼ 0.02% USD/CLP 994.76 ▲ 1.22% USD/COP 3,305 ▼ 0.07% USD/PEN 3.40 ▼ 0.09% USD/ARS 1,545 ▲ 0.03% USD/UYU 40.52 ▲ 3.32% USD/PYG 6,185 ▲ 3.33% USD/BOB 11.60 ▲ 0.86% USD/DOP 60.46 ▲ 0.02% USD/CRC 445.25 ▲ 1.62% USD/GTQ 7.65 ▲ 3.31% USD/HNL 26.90 ▲ 3.30% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 2.73% USD/VES 902.19 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.09 ▲ 2.15% USD/TTD 6.71 ▲ 2.19% EUR/BRL 6.24 ▲ 0.08% BRENT 96.16 ▲ 3.67% WTI 88.95 ▲ 2.80% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.18 ▼ 1.44% GOLD 3,880 ▼ 3.01% SILVER 49.92 ▼ 3.78% SOY 1,220 ▼ 0.77% CORN 442.25 ▼ 1.28% WHEAT 582.50 ▼ 2.84% COFFEE 275.10 ▲ 2.27% SUGAR 18.22 ▼ 1.41% ORANGE JUICE 140.60 ▼ 3.53% COTTON 78.56 ▲ 0.05% COCOA 5,187 ▲ 5.71% BEEF 223.05 ▲ 1.86% CATTLE 331.80 ▼ 0.25% LITHIUM 59.42 ▼ 2.70% PETR4 44.76 ▲ 2.78% VALE3 63.89 ▼ 0.84% ITUB4 41.54 ▼ 0.43% BBDC4 14.24 ▼ 0.63% ABEV3 15.67 ▼ 1.14% BBAS3 15.45 ▼ 8.53% B3SA3 14.77 ▼ 0.20% WEGE3 51.49 ▼ 0.23% PRIO3 63.37 ▲ 3.09% SUZB3 55.80 ▲ 3.72% RENT3 29.66 ▼ 1.92% AZZA3 16.64 ▲ 8.26% CSAN3 2.84 ▼ 6.27% RAIZ4 0.30 ▼ 98.60% PCAR3 2.41 ▼ 5.12% GMAT3 3.89 ▼ 4.66% PSSA3 45.83 ▼ 0.33% CVCB3 0.85 ▼ 1.16% POSI3 3.45 ▲ 3.92% SLCE3 18.26 ▲ 7.10% NATU3 5.34 ▼ 4.98% BRKM5 3.13 ▲ 7.19% RANI3 8.16 ▼ 2.74% CSNA3 4.22 ▼ 6.64%
since 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2026

Brazil Politics - Brazil

Huck and Lula Supporters Have Similar Profiles, Points out Datafolha Poll

By · · 3 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – On one side, Lula (PT) and Luciano Huck. On the other, Sérgio Moro and Jair Bolsonaro (no party).

According to a Datafolha survey that assessed the degree of confidence of the population in 12 personalities in the political scenario, the TV host Huck and the ex-president
Lula have support in similar sectors of society. The same is true of former judge Moro and current president Bolsonaro.

According to a Datafolha survey that assessed the degree of confidence of the population in 12 personalities in the political scenario, the TV presenter Huck and the former president Lula have support in similar sectors of society.
According to a Datafolha survey that assessed the degree of confidence of the population in 12 personalities in the political scenario, the TV host Huck and the ex-president Lula have support in similar sectors of society.
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Datafolha asked respondents to determine, on a scale of 0 to 10, their level of confidence in each of the members on the list. Scores up to five are considered low, from six to eight, average, and from nine to ten, high. The index takes into account the grades awarded by those who claim to know the personality in question.

On average, Lula enjoys 30 percent high confidence (16 percent average and 53 percent low). Huck, on the other hand, has 21 percent (22 percent average and 55 percent low). Both have a higher percentage of high confidence in segments that traditionally support leftists. They are considered more reliable in the Northeast (Lula has 49 percent high confidence; Huck, 28 percent) and among those who studied until primary school (46 percent for Lula, 32 percent for Huck).

A total of 2,948 people were interviewed in 176 municipalities in all regions of the country on December 5th and 6th. The error margin is two percentage points plus or minus, and the reliability index is 95 percent. Both Lula and Huck enjoy greater credibility among those who reject Bolsonaro’s government.

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Colombia's president announces a new cartel airstrike”

Among those who evaluate the president as poor or terrible, 50 percent have high confidence in Lula, and 26 percent in Huck. A potential candidate for the presidency in 2020, Huck has less rejection than the ex-president.

Within the groups of respondents with complete higher education and those earning more than ten minimum wages, where the two see little credibility, the TV host is seen as unreliable (he scored zero) by 21 percent and 19 percent, respectively. In the general average of respondents, he has 16 percent.

Lula, on the other hand, was rated unreliable by 35 percent of the most highly educated and by 48 percent of the wealthiest – on average, the rate was 25 percent.

Huck is also better scored among those who support the government.

Forty-eight percent of those who rate the Bolsonaro management as optimal or good say that Lula is entirely unreliable (they awarded the leftist with a zero rating). In the same group, Huck gets 21 percent.

Like Lula and Huck, Minister Sérgio Moro and President Jair Bolsonaro are also better rated in similar strata.

Moro is the public figure most trusted by Brazilians among the 12 evaluated by Datafolha
Moro is the most trusted public figure by Brazilians among the 12 assessed by Datafolha.

Moro is the most trusted public figure by Brazilians among the 12 assessed by Datafolha. The list includes, in addition to those already mentioned, Vice President Hamilton Mourão, ex-presidental candidates Ciro Gomes and Marina Silva, ex-president Fernando Henrique Cardoso, the governor of São Paulo, João Doria, former vice-presidential candidate Manuela D’Ávila and congressmen Rodrigo Maia and Davi Alcolumbre.

A third (33 percent) said they had high confidence in Moro, 23 percent, average confidence, and 42 percent, low confidence. Bolsonaro, on the other hand, has 22 percent high confidence (22 percent average and 55 percent low).

The two do better among entrepreneurs (57 percent high confidence in Moro, and 41 percent in Bolsonaro) and among those who declare themselves white (41 percent and 27 percent, respectively). Residents of the South of Brazil are also a prominent group: 43 percent have high confidence in the minister, and 27 percent in the president.

On the other hand, the two have a high rejection by indigenous people. Moro is seen as unreliable by 24 percent (on average, 14 percent) and Bolsonaro by 36 percent (23 percent on average).

 

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.