IBOV 171,031.73 ▲ 1.85% IPSA 11,338.38 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 65,729.18 ▲ 2.14% MERVAL 2,913,184 ▲ 1.35% COLCAP 2,459.23 ▲ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 2.60% USD/BRL5.14▼ 0.14% USD/MXN16.90▼ 0.36% USD/CLP914.28— 0.00% USD/COP3,038▼ 1.18% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.06% USD/ARS1,499▲ 0.12% USD/UYU40.20▲ 1.58% USD/PYG5,996▲ 1.55% USD/BOB11.43▲ 0.41% USD/DOP58.82▲ 0.20% USD/CRC450.05▲ 3.34% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.21% USD/HNL26.81▲ 0.31% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.61% USD/VES778.00▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.79% EUR/BRL6.00▼ 0.64% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 171,031.73 ▲ 1.85% IPSA 11,338.38 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 65,729.18 ▲ 2.14% MERVAL 2,913,184 ▲ 1.35% COLCAP 2,459.23 ▲ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 2.60% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Saturday, August 22, 2026

Brazil Politics - Brazil

Ministry of Mines and Energy: Indigenous Lands Could Hold 40 Hydroelectric Plants

By · February 29, 2020 · 4 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – An estimate of the Ministry of Mines and Energy shows that Brazilian indigenous lands have the potential to be home to approximately 40 hydroelectric plants with the capacity to generate a total of 28,000 megawatts (MW).

This 28,000 MW would be equivalent to just over a quarter (27.2 percent) of the installed capacity of the more than 217 hydroelectric plants currently in operation in the country (102,998 MW).

In early February, the federal government submitted a bill to Congress that regulates the exploitation of indigenous lands. The text would allow the construction of hydroelectric dams, oil and gas exploration, and activities such as mining and extraction, provided they are authorized by Congress.

The Constitution provides for the possibility of economic activities on indigenous lands, but only after there has been legislative regulation.

An estimate of the Ministry of Mines and Energy shows that Brazilian indigenous lands have the potential to be home to approximately 40 hydroelectric plants with the capacity to generate a total of 28,000 megawatts (MW).
The Ministry of Mines and Energy claims that Brazilian indigenous lands have the potential to be home to approximately 40 hydroelectric plants with the capacity to generate a total of 28,000 megawatts (MW). (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Experts on indigenous issues heard by the G1 news site criticized the government’s project. In their opinion, works such as hydroelectric dams could lead to permanent negative effects on the lives of the communities affected in these areas.

Financial compensation

The government bill proposes the payment of a financial contribution to the indigenous communities affected by the projects. In the case of hydroelectric plants, the payment to the Indians would represent 0.7 percent of the value of the energy produced.

“If all [40] projects are feasible, we estimate that the affected indigenous communities will be paid approximately R$60 million per year,” the Ministry of Mines and Energy told G1.

The R$60 million estimated by the Ministry would be equivalent to 12 percent of the National Indian Foundation’s budget for 2020 (R$495 million).

Following a request from G1, the Brazilian Association of Large Energy Consumers and Free Consumers (ABRACE) simulated its calculation using the example of the Belo Monte hydroelectric plant, located in Pará.

According to the ABRACE, should Belo Monte be located on indigenous land and therefore required to pay financial participation following the criteria proposed in the government’s bill, it would have to disburse R$22.3 million per year.

Impact

According to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, these 40 hydroelectric plants, if built, would cover “a very small portion” of these indigenous lands – about one percent of the total area.

“The hydroelectric plants are mostly located in the Amazon Basin, with about 20 plants, six in the Araguaia basin, two in the Tocantins basin, two in the São Francisco basin, two in the Uruguay basin and one in the Paraná basin,” the ministry said.

Although the numbers show a reduced impact of these hydroelectric plants, according to Juliana de Paula Batista, an attorney with the Social and Environmental Institute (ISA), projects like these could threaten the survival of indigenous communities.

The Social and Environmental Institute is a non-profit organization that works in the area of environment and human rights and has a specific program aimed at indigenous peoples.

“A hydroelectric plant attracts 5,000 to 20,000 workers. How will the Indians, who are highly vulnerable communities with a specific culture, live together within their territory with 5,000, 15,000, 20,000 workers? Imagine the social, cultural and environmental impact of all this”, said Juliana Batista, who has been working with the indigenous issue for ten years.

The attorney mentioned as an example of the effects of the construction of the Belo Monte plant on the city of Altamira, in Pará.

A study by the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA), released in 2017, pointed to Altamira as the most violent city in the country and showed that the increase in crime was related to the population explosion and the disorderly growth spurred by the construction of the hydroelectric plant.

“It doesn’t matter how much it is going to affect. It matters whether these indigenous communities will be able to sustain their physical and cultural survival [after the construction of the plants],” she said, in reference to the Ministry’s estimate that only one percent of the total area of indigenous lands would be covered by the plants.

Veto power

For Renato Sztutman, professor of the department of anthropology at the University of São Paulo (USP), even if it actually reaches the indigenous people, the millionaire financial contribution planned by the government will not offset the losses that the communities should suffer.

“The benefits [with the implementation of hydroelectric plants on indigenous lands] are certainly much lower than the damage,” Sztutman said. According to Sztutman, interventions such as diverting the course of a river, required in this type of work, “radically change the environment” where these communities live, resulting in a reaction in the soil and in the availability of food.

The professor further criticized the fact that the government’s bill limits the Indians’ power to veto the ventures.

According to the bill, the communities will only have the power to veto prospecting on their lands.

In the case of hydroelectric plants, oil and gas exploration, and mining, the government will be entitled to forward the request for authorization to Congress even if the Indians oppose it when consulted.

“The least the indigenous people should have is the power of veto,” he said.

Source: G1

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.