RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – The recent judgment handed down by The Hague-based International Court of Justice (ICJ) concerning the border controversy between Guyana and Venezuela has been rejected by the Venezuelan Government.
In the landmark ruling handed down last Friday, December 18th, the ICJ ruled that the decades-old border controversy will finally be settled through a judicial process, a process that has been rejected by Venezuela.
A statement from the Venezuelan Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Monday said that by deciding it possesses jurisdiction over the validity of the 1899 arbitration award, the ICJ “commits an incomprehensible and unusual error.”
“With its decision, the court not only violates its own doctrine established and sustained for decades, but also its extensive case law. Consequently, Venezuela rejects the decision of the ICJ, in perfect accordance with the arguments that it opportunely offered — from its sovereign position of not appearing — to assist with it in its duty to issue a pronouncement where the law, the principles of law and customary law required him to declare his obvious lack of jurisdiction.”
The Maduro-led Administration in Venezuela said it repudiates the ruling issued by the ICJ while claiming, once again, the validity of the 1966 Geneva Agreement and ratifying that it will continue to exercise its claim.
Venezuela also reiterated its call for this controversy to be settled amicably and proposes the beginning of direct negotiations with Guyana, in accordance with international law and on the basis of the 1966 Geneva Agreement, which mandates both parties to resolve the issue peacefully.
The case currently before the ICJ was instituted on March 29, 2018, by Guyana against Venezuela, in which Guyana is asking the ICJ to pronounce on the legal validity and binding effect of the 1899 Arbitral Award, which determined the boundaries between the two countries.
In the judgment, President of the ICJ, Judge Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, said the court concluded that it has jurisdiction to hear Guyana’s claims concerning the validity of the 1899 Award and related questions of the definitive settlement of the land boundary dispute.
The court decided that the referral of the matter to the ICJ by United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres on January 30, 2018, was legal as is contemplated in the agreement.
The court’s president said now that the ICJ has claimed jurisdiction, Venezuela will be able, if it so wishes, to appear before the court to present its arguments.
According to the judgment, the 1899 Award states that both Guyana and Venezuela consented to the means of a judicial settlement.
Venezuela is maintaining a claim to 70 percent of Guyana’s territory, arguing that the 1899 agreement, which determined the boundaries between the two countries, is null and void.
More: Latin America news in English, every day from The Rio Times.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error
Venezuela and the United States
- What Is Going On Between Venezuela and the United States?
- What Is Going On Between Venezuela and the United States?
- Venezuela Geopolitics Explained, US Now Runs Its Oil
- Venezuela Politics 2026, Who Holds Power After Maduro