IBOV 166,191.45 ▼ 0.82% IPC MEX 71,033.20 ▲ 0.30% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.49▲ 0.51% USD/MXN18.73▲ 0.57% USD/CLP977.69▲ 1.16% USD/COP3,230▼ 0.63% USD/PEN3.44▼ 0.08% USD/ARS1,545▼ 0.19% USD/UYU40.22▲ 3.24% USD/PYG6,358▲ 9.88% USD/BOB11.92▲ 1.74% USD/DOP59.79▼ 1.17% USD/CRC449.63▲ 2.27% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.16% USD/HNL26.87▼ 0.09% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.07% USD/VES892.65▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.79▲ 2.67% USD/TTD6.64▲ 1.14% EUR/BRL6.17▲ 0.44% BRENT 98.96 ▲ 4.59% WTI 91.00 ▲ 3.27% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.24 ▼ 2.48% GOLD 4,106 ▲ 0.82% SILVER 52.10 ▼ 0.04% SOY 1,190 ▼ 0.29% CORN 440.75 ▼ 0.79% WHEAT 599.25 ▲ 0.13% COFFEE 277.40 ▼ 0.84% SUGAR 18.60 ▲ 0.70% ORANGE JUICE 136.15 ▲ 3.54% COTTON 78.45 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,290 ▼ 3.04% BEEF 214.48 ▼ 1.62% CATTLE 320.58 ▼ 3.45% LITHIUM 60.18 ▲ 0.13% PETR4 45.95 ▼ 2.48% VALE3 62.67 ▲ 0.51% ITUB4 39.97 ▲ 0.65% BBDC4 13.77 ▼ 2.06% ABEV3 15.48 ▲ 1.51% BBAS3 16.49 — 0.00% B3SA3 14.36 ▲ 0.42% WEGE3 48.30 ▼ 3.50% PRIO3 61.54 ▼ 0.97% SUZB3 52.29 ▼ 0.11% RENT3 29.07 ▼ 1.32% AZZA3 14.06 ▲ 0.64% CSAN3 2.50 ▲ 4.60% RAIZ4 27.57 ▲ 1.73% PCAR3 2.39 ▲ 3.91% GMAT3 3.71 ▲ 5.10% PSSA3 43.71 ▼ 2.63% CVCB3 0.82 ▲ 1.23% POSI3 3.11 ▼ 1.89% SLCE3 16.35 ▼ 1.51% NATU3 5.35 ▼ 1.29% BRKM5 3.03 ▼ 0.66% RANI3 8.46 ▼ 1.97% CSNA3 4.05 ▼ 0.74% IBOV 166,191.45 ▼ 0.82% IPC MEX 71,033.20 ▲ 0.30% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.49 ▲ 0.51% USD/MXN 18.74 ▲ 0.65% USD/CLP 977.69 ▲ 1.16% USD/COP 3,230 ▼ 0.63% USD/PEN 3.44 ▼ 0.08% USD/ARS 1,545 ▼ 0.19% USD/UYU 40.22 ▲ 3.24% USD/PYG 6,358 ▲ 9.88% USD/BOB 11.92 ▲ 1.74% USD/DOP 59.79 ▼ 1.17% USD/CRC 449.63 ▲ 2.27% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.16% USD/HNL 26.87 ▼ 0.09% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.07% USD/VES 892.65 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.79 ▲ 2.67% USD/TTD 6.64 ▲ 1.14% EUR/BRL 6.17 ▲ 0.44% BRENT 98.96 ▲ 4.59% WTI 91.00 ▲ 3.27% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.24 ▼ 2.48% GOLD 4,106 ▲ 0.82% SILVER 52.10 ▼ 0.04% SOY 1,190 ▼ 0.29% CORN 440.75 ▼ 0.79% WHEAT 599.25 ▲ 0.13% COFFEE 277.40 ▼ 0.84% SUGAR 18.60 ▲ 0.70% ORANGE JUICE 136.15 ▲ 3.54% COTTON 78.45 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,290 ▼ 3.04% BEEF 214.48 ▼ 1.62% CATTLE 320.58 ▼ 3.45% LITHIUM 60.18 ▲ 0.13% PETR4 45.95 ▼ 2.48% VALE3 62.67 ▲ 0.51% ITUB4 39.97 ▲ 0.65% BBDC4 13.77 ▼ 2.06% ABEV3 15.48 ▲ 1.51% BBAS3 16.49 — 0.00% B3SA3 14.36 ▲ 0.42% WEGE3 48.30 ▼ 3.50% PRIO3 61.54 ▼ 0.97% SUZB3 52.29 ▼ 0.11% RENT3 29.07 ▼ 1.32% AZZA3 14.06 ▲ 0.64% CSAN3 2.50 ▲ 4.60% RAIZ4 27.57 ▲ 1.73% PCAR3 2.39 ▲ 3.91% GMAT3 3.71 ▲ 5.10% PSSA3 43.71 ▼ 2.63% CVCB3 0.82 ▲ 1.23% POSI3 3.11 ▼ 1.89% SLCE3 16.35 ▼ 1.51% NATU3 5.35 ▼ 1.29% BRKM5 3.03 ▼ 0.66% RANI3 8.46 ▼ 1.97% CSNA3 4.05 ▼ 0.74%
since 2009
Friday, November 6, 2026

Covid-19 Brazil

Spread of Covid-19 in Brazil was conciously caused by Bolsonaro government – USP study

By · June 8, 2021 · 3 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – A study commissioned by the Senate “Covid CPI” investigative committee reinforces the thesis that the spread of the coronavirus in Brazil was due to the federal government’s “commitment and efficiency” in its policies and practices, rather than negligence.

“On the contrary, the systematization of data shows the commitment and efficiency in favor of the wide spread of the virus in national territory, openly aiming to resume economic activity as soon as possible.”

Spread of Covid-19 in Brazil was conciously caused by Bolsonaro government – USP study
USP study finds spread of Covid in Brazil was caused by Bolsonaro government.
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

“The results [of the study] dispel the persistent interpretation that there was [only] incompetence and negligence on the part of the federal government in the management of the pandemic,” the text states.

The study, named “Mapping and analysis of the legal norms of response to Covid-19 in Brazil,” was conducted by the Center for Studies and Research in Health Law (CEPEDISA) of the University of São Paulo’s (USP) School of Public Health. The report, delivered to CPI senators on Monday, June 7, confirms the conclusions drawn in January, when a first version of the document was published.

According to the study, “the confluence between normative, management, and discourse aspects of the federal response to the pandemic was confirmed, with coherence between what was said and what was done. Therefore, the assumption of the presence of a strategy to spread the disease is founded.”

The report bases this assessment on federal government actions such as the “advocacy of herd (or collective) immunity through infection (or transmission) as a form of response to Covid-19, promoting the belief that ‘natural immunity’ resulting from virus infection would protect individuals and lead to pandemic control, as well as unsubstantiated estimates of the number of deaths and the pandemic’s end date.”

The study also recalls the “constant encouragement [by the federal government] for the population’s exposure to the virus and the non-compliance with preventive health measures, based on its denial of the severity of the disease, defense of courage, and the purported existence of an ‘early treatment’ for Covid-19, converted into public policy.”

Another point assessed as part of the “strategy to spread the disease” is the “trivialization of the deaths and sequelae caused by the disease, failing to protect the victims’ families and survivors, promoting the notion that only the elderly or people with comorbidities would die, or people with no access to ‘early treatment’.”

The study also cites the “systematic obstruction of containment measures promoted by governors and mayors, justified by the alleged conflict between protecting health and protecting the economy, which includes spreading the idea that quarantine measures cause greater damage than the virus, and that these measures would lead to hunger and unemployment, rather than the pandemic; the ‘focus on measures of assistance and abstention from measures to prevent the disease, often adopting measures only when challenged by other institutions, particularly the National Congress and the Judiciary’; and ‘attacks on critics of the federal response, the press, and professional journalism, particularly by questioning the extent of the disease in the country’, in addition to ‘awareness of the impropriety of certain conducts.”

“Finally, the persistent conduct of Brazilian federal authorities in the face of the wide spread of the disease in the national territory and the sharp increase in the number of deaths draws attention, although institutions such as the Federal Supreme Court, the Federal Audit Court and the Federal Prosecutor’s Office have pointed out, countless times, the noncompliance with the Brazilian legal order of conscious and voluntary conduct and omissions of federal managers, as well as scientific and health sector bodies have tirelessly done,” says the study.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error · Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.