IBOV 171,031.73 ▲ 1.85% IPSA 11,338.38 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 65,729.18 ▲ 2.14% MERVAL 2,913,184 ▲ 1.30% COLCAP 2,459.23 ▲ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 2.60% USD/BRL5.14— 0.00% USD/MXN16.93▲ 0.13% USD/CLP914.28— 0.00% USD/COP3,044▲ 0.21% USD/PEN3.36▲ 0.04% USD/ARS1,499▼ 0.03% USD/UYU40.20▲ 1.52% USD/PYG5,996▲ 1.39% USD/BOB11.43▲ 0.51% USD/DOP58.61▼ 0.07% USD/CRC450.05▲ 1.95% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.13% USD/HNL26.81▲ 1.55% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES782.70▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.82% EUR/BRL6.00▲ 0.03% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 171,031.73 ▲ 1.85% IPSA 11,338.38 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 65,729.18 ▲ 2.14% MERVAL 2,913,184 ▲ 1.30% COLCAP 2,459.23 ▲ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 2.60% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Monday, August 24, 2026

Brazil In-Depth - Brazil

Brazil’s Recession Cut Workers’ Real Income by 16% in Five Years

By · June 24, 2019 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

By Iolanda Fonseca

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – In addition to having killed off jobs, which led to an increase in the number of informal workers, the recession years have also eaten away at the income of workers in most sectors.

Depending on the area of operation, the actual loss (adjusted for inflation) exceeded 16 percent in the last five years. Of the nine private sectors analyzed by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), five registered a significant drop in monthly employees’ income.

Depending on the area of operation, the actual loss (inflation considered) exceeded 16 percent in the last five years. (Photo. Internet Reproduction)
Depending on the area of operation, the actual loss (inflation considered) exceeded 16 percent in the last five years. (Photo. Internet Reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Between the first quarter of 2014, before the recession, and the first three months of 2019, housing and catering workers (hotels, inns, restaurants or food sellers), construction and transport workers have suffered the most considerable income loss, from 7.2 percent to 16.3 percent, according to data from the National Household Sample Survey (Pnad) by IBGE, according to LCA consultancy reporting for leading daily paper Estado de S.Paulo.

Among private sector workers, only those in agriculture had a significant actual increase of 5.2 percent in their usual income over the same period. In the group, including those working in the public sector, an even more significant actual increase of 7.5 percent was recorded.

The drop in household income and the increase in informal labor – mainly in activities related to services, such as App transport and food sales – and the collapse of the construction sector helps to explain these workers’ lower income, says economist Cosmo Donato, of LCA.

On the one hand, families are less able to afford meals outside the home, transportation, and leisure today than they were in 2014, says Donato. “On the other hand, those unemployed in industry and commerce have resorted to transportation and food to survive, selling food on the street or becoming App drivers, for instance. Informal labor has dragged down income.”

The unemployed from industry and commerce have resorted to selling food on the streets to survive. (Photo: IESB)

Wallinson de Melo, 34, a private chauffeur and taxi driver, is among the workers who have felt the impact of increased informality in their sector. “Until 2014, we could easily get up to R$12,000 (US$3,000) per month.

That’s when I fulfilled my dream of buying a house for my mother in Paraíba. Today, if I’m lucky, I make R$6,000. Because of unemployment, people switched from taxis to buses, and the competition increased; many engineers became Uber drivers. Those days won’t come back.”

Many who lost their jobs were forced into informal labor or got new positions with lower salaries; those who remained employed failed to be promoted, says economist at the University of Brasília (UnB) José Luís Oreiro.

“The restaurant waiter with less money in his pocket spends less on the grocery store. The grocery store owner stops going to the restaurant. The decline in regular income has a cascading negative effect on the economy.”

The recession is further reflected in workers’ incomes. The businessman who had plans to expand gave up.

“Many hotels have temporarily deactivated some floors during periods of weaker activity,” adds Darly Abreu, director of Sinthoresp (a union bringing together hotel, restaurant, snack bar, and bar workers, among others).

He points out that, in addition to less regular income, those who work in restaurants are tipped less than before the recession.

(Source: O Estado de S. Paulo)

This article was drafted with automated assistance and reviewed before publication. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.