IBOV 166,934.20 ▼ 0.10% IPSA 11,042.67 ▲ 0.39% IPC MEX 64,397.45 ▼ 0.66% MERVAL 2,947,349 ▼ 1.77% COLCAP 2,452.46 ▲ 0.84% BVL PERÚ 58,104.31 ▲ 0.40% USD/BRL5.21▲ 0.47% USD/MXN17.02▼ 0.08% USD/CLP914.45▼ 0.02% USD/COP3,141▼ 0.15% USD/PEN3.37▼ 0.21% USD/ARS1,488▼ 0.28% USD/UYU40.33▲ 1.50% USD/PYG5,984▲ 2.22% USD/BOB11.54▼ 0.69% USD/DOP58.45▲ 0.55% USD/CRC446.12▲ 0.91% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.25% USD/HNL26.79▲ 0.54% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.63% USD/VES769.14▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.70▲ 0.74% EUR/BRL6.05▲ 1.03% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 166,934.20 ▼ 0.10% IPSA 11,042.67 ▲ 0.39% IPC MEX 64,397.45 ▼ 0.66% MERVAL 2,947,349 ▼ 1.77% COLCAP 2,452.46 ▲ 0.84% BVL PERÚ 58,104.31 ▲ 0.40% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Sunday, August 16, 2026

Brazil’s UBS BB sees potential dispute between Bolsonaro and Lula in 2022 election; projects market anxiety

By · September 14, 2021 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – Outlining a preliminary scenario of the 2022 elections and its potential impact on markets, Fabio Ramos and Alexandre de Azara, economists at UBS BB, believe a runoff between President Jair Bolsonaro and ex-president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is more likely.

The UBS BB economists further point out that as the pandemic subsides, they see that the market’s focus is shifting to the elections. “For the first time, Brazil may be faced with a choice between a sitting President and a former one,” they point out.

There is increased anxiety in the market on this point, most likely due to heightened fiscal risks.

Economists at UBS BB believe in a runoff between President Jair Bolsonaro and ex-president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as more likely. (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
Latin American markets, currencies and companies.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

“The term structure [of the yield curve] shows that inflation expectations are up for the long term. We attribute this to the potential fiscal risks associated with election uncertainties,” the economists point out.

This is because it is unclear how the main candidates would handle high public debt and fiscal rules (mainly the Fiscal Responsibility Law and the Spending Cap).

The assessment is that there is no room for fiscal maneuvering in this field. “Public debt is already high compared to other emerging economies, thereby making financial conditions and the economy more vulnerable to fiscal setbacks.”

They point out that left-wing leaders have been critical of the fiscal rules, while in the right-wing arena, proposals and commitment to long-term fiscal consolidation are still unclear. “As long as uncertainty lingers, it is difficult to expect strong economic performance for 2022. We recently revised our GDP estimate for 2022 from 2.5% to 2%,” they point out.

However, the economic situation in Brazil will be at the heart of the electoral dispute, according to the economists.

In any case, the investment bank advocates the maintenance of fiscal responsibility by whoever wins the presidential elections, due to this commitment’s positive impact on growth, inflation, and the interest curve.

As for the electoral scenario, Ramos and Azara believe it is unlikely that Lula will be convicted again by the courts to the point of preventing him from running in the 2022 election. Nevertheless, they see some room for the so-called third route, considering that between 45% and 55% of the electorate is more “fluid” and the two main candidates have high disapproval rates.

The institution recalls that Bolsonaro’s approval stands between 25% and 33%, lower when compared to other presidents seeking re-election. The economists also point out the importance of the economic debate in this dispute, in line with most electoral races.

“Economic conditions play a critical role in elections. We think this is also true in Brazil. And the current assessment of the federal government is at its lowest in the mandate,” they assess.

They also see that there are sensitive economic issues on the radar, such as the inflationary process and the slow rebound of the labor market. “We expect consumer confidence to improve in the coming months. However, it is unclear whether, or to what extent, this may increase the population’s rating of the government,” they say.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.