IBOV 171,031.73 ▲ 1.85% IPSA 11,338.38 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 65,729.18 ▲ 2.14% MERVAL 2,913,184 ▲ 1.35% COLCAP 2,459.23 ▲ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 2.60% USD/BRL5.14▼ 0.14% USD/MXN16.90▼ 0.36% USD/CLP914.28— 0.00% USD/COP3,038▼ 1.18% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.06% USD/ARS1,499▲ 0.12% USD/UYU40.20▲ 1.58% USD/PYG5,996▲ 1.55% USD/BOB11.43▲ 0.41% USD/DOP58.82▲ 0.20% USD/CRC450.05▲ 3.34% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.21% USD/HNL26.81▲ 0.31% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.61% USD/VES778.00▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.79% EUR/BRL6.00▼ 0.64% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 171,031.73 ▲ 1.85% IPSA 11,338.38 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 65,729.18 ▲ 2.14% MERVAL 2,913,184 ▲ 1.35% COLCAP 2,459.23 ▲ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 2.60% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Sunday, August 23, 2026

Society Brazil

Brazilian Officials May Charge Neymar With Sexual Harassment

By · June 5, 2019 · 4 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

By Lise Alves, Senior Contributing Reporter

SÃO PAULO, BRAZIL – Attempts by Brazil’s soccer star Neymar, to defend himself against rape allegations, may be backfiring. The Paris Saint-Germain player tried to defend himself by releasing a seven-minute Instagram video with messages and pictures of his accuser. But in doing so, say some prosecutors, Neymar committed a crime, punishable by one to five years in jail.

Soccer legend Neymar may be in trouble with Brazilian authorities after showing intimate photos and conversations, photo by Gustavo Gomes/Agencia Brasil.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

A Brazilian law sanctioned in September of 2018 criminalizes the act of offering, exchanging, making available, transmitting, distributing, publishing or divulging, by photography, video or other audiovisual means, sex scenes, nudity or pornography without the consent of all those depicted.

On Saturday, after being accused of rape by a 26-year-old Brazilian who claims she was flown to Paris by the soccer star and attacked there, Neymar took to his social media to release his side of the story.

“From now on I will expose everything, expose all the conversation I had with the girl, all our moments, which is intimate, but it is necessary to open, it is necessary to expose to prove that nothing really happened …” said Neymar on video addressing his millions of fans through his social media.

Hours after the disclosure of the intimate photographs and conversations, Instagram decided to take down the content. But by that time, say legal experts, the crime had already been committed.

“When intimate content is divulged on the internet, women are already immediately found guilty only because they exercise their sexuality, and with the reach of the message and the complicity of friends and strangers this aggression is infinitely multiplied, which makes this crime even more serious,” notes Jacira Melo, executive director of the NGO Institute Patrícia Galvāo, in a statement to The Rio Times. The institute is one of the leading advocates of women’s rights in Brazil.

A survey by the Brazilian Forum of Public Security pointed out that the cases of violence against women practiced via the internet increased from 1.2 percent in 2017 to 8.2 percent this year.

Neymar Sr., the soccer star’s father, defended his son’s actions by stating that he needed to defend himself quickly. According to Neymar Sr., it is preferable to be charged with a virtual crime than rape.

“We hid the image of the girl, the name; we did what was possible. But it was a defense. We did not commit a crime. We did not have a choice,” said Neymar Sr. during a TV interview on BandTV on Monday.

“I prefer Neymar to be charged with an internet crime than rape. It was a defense, and he needed to defend himself quickly. Better be accurate and show what really happened,” he added.

Many legal experts, however, say that Brazil’s Penal Code does not make a distinction between those trying to defend themselves, and those promoting what is commonly known as “revenge porn”.

Brazilian law passed last year criminalizes the sending and distributing of photographs with sexual content without the consent of those depicted, photo internet reproduction.

They note that Neymar’s arguments–that he was only trying to defend himself and that there was no malice involved in releasing the photos–are not adequate justifications.

“The law is clear. The defined crime does not require any specific intent. If he exposed the images on the networks as a form of defense for other accusations, this is legally irrelevant,” law professor Maira Zapater was quoted as saying by daily Huffington Post Brasil.

But while there are some who believe that a felony was committed, others agree with Neymar Sr., stating that they believe the soccer star did nothing illegal.

Fundação Getulio Vargas’ (FGV) digital law professor Luiz Augusto D’Urso told Jovem Pan radio that there is “clearly no malice” by Neymar in divulging the intimate photos.

“The objective of the player was to defend himself: publishing the entire conversation he kept with the woman who accuses him. Without malice and because the photos are blurred, the possible occurrence of a crime of disclosure of third-party nude photos is removed,” added the professor.

On Monday, June 3rd, Neymar was served with a summons requiring him to testify at Rio de Janeiro’s Computer Crime Repression Office (DRCI). Authorities want the player to answer questions about the disclosure of conversations and intimate images he put on his social media.

Currently in Brazil to train for and participate in the Copa America, Neymar’s testimony is scheduled for next week at the specialized police headquarters.

But whatever the outcome of this internet investigation, many already think that the image of Brazil’s golden boy has been tarnished.

“We don’t know if he is the victim of some sort of extortion attempt. This has to be investigated. What we do know is that to release intimate conversations and photos, of a person without his/her authorization is to incur some problems, at the very least ethical ones. Ethically, the release of photos/conversation speaks against the person, in this case, Neymar,” concluded psychologist Vera Iaconelli during a radio interview on Tuesday.

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.