IBOV 172,060.43 ▲ 0.42% IPC MEX 72,006.05 ▲ 0.16% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.58▲ 0.03% USD/MXN18.59▼ 0.08% USD/CLP983.83▲ 0.10% USD/COP3,279▼ 0.87% USD/PEN3.41▼ 0.02% USD/ARS1,544▼ 0.03% USD/UYU40.52▲ 3.32% USD/PYG6,174▲ 3.14% USD/BOB11.63▲ 1.12% USD/DOP60.48▲ 0.05% USD/CRC446.01▲ 1.79% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.18% USD/HNL26.90▲ 0.20% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.73% USD/VES902.19▲ 0.19% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.49▲ 2.33% USD/TTD6.72▲ 2.22% EUR/BRL6.19▼ 0.59% BRENT 91.91 ▼ 0.92% WTI 85.65 ▼ 1.02% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.21 ▼ 0.96% GOLD 3,958 ▼ 1.06% SILVER 51.27 ▼ 1.19% SOY 1,228 ▼ 0.10% CORN 447.25 ▼ 0.17% WHEAT 596.00 ▼ 0.58% COFFEE 269.00 — 0.00% SUGAR 18.03 ▼ 2.44% ORANGE JUICE 146.60 ▼ 0.10% COTTON 82.88 ▲ 5.55% COCOA 5,077 ▲ 3.46% BEEF 218.98 ▼ 0.10% CATTLE 332.63 ▲ 0.69% LITHIUM 61.07 ▲ 1.82% PETR4 43.55 ▼ 3.11% VALE3 64.43 ▼ 0.57% ITUB4 41.72 ▲ 1.26% BBDC4 14.33 ▼ 1.44% ABEV3 15.85 ▲ 0.38% BBAS3 16.89 ▼ 1.23% B3SA3 14.80 ▲ 2.21% WEGE3 51.61 ▲ 1.30% PRIO3 61.47 ▲ 2.42% SUZB3 53.80 ▼ 1.21% RENT3 30.24 ▲ 1.51% AZZA3 15.37 ▲ 4.34% CSAN3 3.03 ▲ 13.06% RAIZ4 0.30 ▼ 98.60% PCAR3 2.54 ▼ 0.78% GMAT3 4.08 ▲ 7.09% PSSA3 45.98 ▼ 1.48% CVCB3 0.86 — 0.00% POSI3 3.32 ▲ 5.40% SLCE3 17.05 ▼ 0.23% NATU3 5.62 ▲ 1.26% BRKM5 2.92 — 0.00% RANI3 8.39 ▼ 0.71% CSNA3 4.52 ▲ 3.20% IBOV 172,060.43 ▲ 0.42% IPC MEX 72,006.05 ▲ 0.16% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.58 ▲ 0.02% USD/MXN 18.57 ▼ 0.15% USD/CLP 983.91 ▲ 0.11% USD/COP 3,288 ▼ 0.57% USD/PEN 3.41 ▼ 0.02% USD/ARS 1,544 ▼ 0.03% USD/UYU 40.52 ▲ 3.32% USD/PYG 6,174 ▲ 3.14% USD/BOB 11.63 ▲ 1.12% USD/DOP 60.48 ▲ 0.05% USD/CRC 446.01 ▲ 1.79% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.16% USD/HNL 26.90 ▲ 3.29% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 2.73% USD/VES 902.19 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.49 ▲ 2.41% USD/TTD 6.72 ▲ 2.22% EUR/BRL 6.20 ▼ 0.57% BRENT 91.91 ▼ 0.92% WTI 85.65 ▼ 1.02% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.21 ▼ 0.96% GOLD 3,958 ▼ 1.06% SILVER 51.27 ▼ 1.19% SOY 1,228 ▼ 0.10% CORN 447.25 ▼ 0.17% WHEAT 596.00 ▼ 0.58% COFFEE 269.00 — 0.00% SUGAR 18.03 ▼ 2.44% ORANGE JUICE 146.60 ▼ 0.10% COTTON 82.88 ▲ 5.55% COCOA 5,077 ▲ 3.46% BEEF 218.98 ▼ 0.10% CATTLE 332.63 ▲ 0.69% LITHIUM 61.07 ▲ 1.82% PETR4 43.55 ▼ 3.11% VALE3 64.43 ▼ 0.57% ITUB4 41.72 ▲ 1.26% BBDC4 14.33 ▼ 1.44% ABEV3 15.85 ▲ 0.38% BBAS3 16.89 ▼ 1.23% B3SA3 14.80 ▲ 2.21% WEGE3 51.61 ▲ 1.30% PRIO3 61.47 ▲ 2.42% SUZB3 53.80 ▼ 1.21% RENT3 30.24 ▲ 1.51% AZZA3 15.37 ▲ 4.34% CSAN3 3.03 ▲ 13.06% RAIZ4 0.30 ▼ 98.60% PCAR3 2.54 ▼ 0.78% GMAT3 4.08 ▲ 7.09% PSSA3 45.98 ▼ 1.48% CVCB3 0.86 — 0.00% POSI3 3.32 ▲ 5.40% SLCE3 17.05 ▼ 0.23% NATU3 5.62 ▲ 1.26% BRKM5 2.92 — 0.00% RANI3 8.39 ▼ 0.71% CSNA3 4.52 ▲ 3.20%
since 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2026

Chile Latin America

Study: 15% of children born in Chile fall below poverty line; figure rises to 26% for migrants

By · · 4 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – The drivers of this increase were linked to the Covid-19 pandemic and the social and economic crisis associated with part of that period. However, there is one group – among those surveyed – that suffered an even more radical deterioration in their income: migrants.

If by 2017, 10.9% of the foreign community living in Chile was in poverty, the figure increased to 17% in 2020, while among the Chilean population it rose from 8.4% to 10.4%.

0
Poverty in general affects more children and adolescents born outside Chile.
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The “Casen and Migration: A study of poverty, work and social security in the migrant population” report, prepared by the Studies Area of the Jesuit Migrant Service (SJM) based on data from the Casen survey, points out that among migrants, there are groups worst affected by poverty: women, children and adolescents and those living in the northern part of the country.

Among the migrant population living in poverty, the most affected are found in the Far North (regions of Arica and Parinacota, Tarapacá and Antofagasta), where the rate of poverty among foreigners reaches 28% and the rate of labor informality stands at 35%.

Indices exposing a gender gap in the migrant population were also found: 78% of foreign men are employed, while among women the figure stands at 60%. In addition, the share of women employed in informal jobs is higher (25%) than that of men (22%).

“It is relevant to highlight that women in both groups (Chileans and migrants) show higher rates of informal employment than men, here there is also a gender gap, where women would be employed in more precarious jobs and with lower social security,” the report states.

Poverty in general affects more children and adolescents born outside Chile, where 26%, or 1 in 4, were in a situation of poverty in 2020.

The report also notes that 15% of children and adolescents born in Chile fall below the poverty line, but within this group, when a child born in the country has at least one migrant parent, the figure stands at 22% below the poverty line.

“Migrant children and adolescents require special attention, many of whom, as we have seen in our daily work, had problems accessing education due to the lack of suitable technological devices for online education during the pandemic,” said the SJM’s Director of Public Advocacy and Studies Carlos Figueroa.

“We must also be attentive to the need for immigration legalization of this group and their families, bearing in mind that some immigration policies may affect the best interests of children. This is a problem that we adults must quickly solve,” he added.

CAUSES

The SJM report found that the higher increase in poverty rates in the migrant population compared to the Chilean between 2017 and 2020 is not due to a labor insertion or formality issue, nor to the features of the current migratory pattern (which has been settled in Chile for a few years).

Lack of access to social security explains this increase, such as the situation of migrants in the Far North region, where 14% of the foreign population lives and 11% of migrant labor force is located.

In this respect, the study points out the lower incidence of state aid during the pandemic as the most significant cause for this greater impact on the migrant population.

Along these lines, the Emergency Family Income (IFE), one of the most relevant benefits during the pandemic, was received to a lesser extent in migrant households (22%) than in Chilean households (32%). This is replicated in the different income brackets, with significant discrepancies.

According to the SJM, the higher increase in poverty in the migrant population than in the national population between 2017 and 2020 is due to a lower incidence of institutional support networks, rather than to a labor insertion or formality issue, or to the features of the current migratory pattern.

“If the lack of institutional support networks is a factor behind increased poverty among the migrant population, in our opinion it is even more important to focus efforts on regularizing migrants, as well as on the availability of formal channels to guide them in accessing rights such as health, housing and education,” Figueroa pointed out.

“It is also imperative to see migration from a regional perspective, where no country on its own can address this social phenomenon,” he added.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.