IBOV 166,608.52 ▼ 0.57% IPC MEX 70,819.80 ▲ 0.91% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.49▲ 0.51% USD/MXN18.72▲ 0.53% USD/CLP978.07▲ 1.20% USD/COP3,231▼ 0.60% USD/PEN3.44▼ 0.03% USD/ARS1,545▼ 0.19% USD/UYU40.22▲ 3.24% USD/PYG6,031▲ 4.22% USD/BOB11.94▲ 1.91% USD/DOP60.10▼ 0.66% USD/CRC449.63▲ 2.27% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.17% USD/HNL26.87▼ 0.09% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.07% USD/VES892.65▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.79▲ 2.67% USD/TTD6.64▲ 1.14% EUR/BRL6.16▲ 0.21% BRENT 98.02 ▲ 3.59% WTI 90.35 ▲ 2.53% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.23 ▼ 2.64% GOLD 4,110 ▲ 0.92% SILVER 52.29 ▲ 0.32% SOY 1,190 ▼ 0.29% CORN 440.75 ▼ 0.79% WHEAT 599.25 ▲ 0.13% COFFEE 277.40 ▼ 0.84% SUGAR 18.60 ▲ 0.70% ORANGE JUICE 136.15 ▲ 3.54% COTTON 78.45 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,290 ▼ 3.04% BEEF 214.48 ▼ 1.62% CATTLE 320.58 ▼ 3.45% LITHIUM 60.38 ▼ 2.42% PETR4 46.49 ▼ 1.34% VALE3 62.96 ▲ 0.98% ITUB4 39.87 ▲ 0.40% BBDC4 13.87 ▼ 1.35% ABEV3 15.47 ▲ 1.44% BBAS3 16.48 ▼ 0.06% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.28% WEGE3 47.93 ▼ 4.24% PRIO3 62.70 ▲ 0.90% SUZB3 52.07 ▼ 0.53% RENT3 29.33 ▼ 0.44% AZZA3 14.23 ▲ 1.86% CSAN3 2.53 ▲ 5.86% RAIZ4 27.57 ▲ 1.73% PCAR3 2.37 ▲ 3.04% GMAT3 3.63 ▲ 2.83% PSSA3 43.71 ▼ 2.63% CVCB3 0.81 — 0.00% POSI3 3.17 — 0.00% SLCE3 16.36 ▼ 1.45% NATU3 5.37 ▼ 0.92% BRKM5 3.03 ▼ 0.66% RANI3 8.50 ▼ 1.51% CSNA3 4.14 ▲ 1.47% IBOV 166,608.52 ▼ 0.57% IPC MEX 70,819.80 ▲ 0.91% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.49 ▲ 0.58% USD/MXN 18.75 ▲ 0.70% USD/CLP 977.94 ▲ 1.18% USD/COP 3,231 ▼ 0.60% USD/PEN 3.44 ▼ 0.05% USD/ARS 1,545 ▼ 0.19% USD/UYU 40.22 ▲ 3.24% USD/PYG 6,031 ▲ 4.22% USD/BOB 11.94 ▲ 1.91% USD/DOP 60.57 ▲ 0.12% USD/CRC 449.63 ▲ 2.27% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.17% USD/HNL 26.87 ▼ 0.09% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.07% USD/VES 892.65 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.79 ▲ 2.67% USD/TTD 6.64 ▲ 1.14% EUR/BRL 6.16 ▲ 0.30% BRENT 98.02 ▲ 3.59% WTI 90.35 ▲ 2.53% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.23 ▼ 2.64% GOLD 4,110 ▲ 0.92% SILVER 52.29 ▲ 0.32% SOY 1,190 ▼ 0.29% CORN 440.75 ▼ 0.79% WHEAT 599.25 ▲ 0.13% COFFEE 277.40 ▼ 0.84% SUGAR 18.60 ▲ 0.70% ORANGE JUICE 136.15 ▲ 3.54% COTTON 78.45 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,290 ▼ 3.04% BEEF 214.48 ▼ 1.62% CATTLE 320.58 ▼ 3.45% LITHIUM 60.38 ▼ 2.42% PETR4 46.49 ▼ 1.34% VALE3 62.96 ▲ 0.98% ITUB4 39.87 ▲ 0.40% BBDC4 13.87 ▼ 1.35% ABEV3 15.47 ▲ 1.44% BBAS3 16.48 ▼ 0.06% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.28% WEGE3 47.93 ▼ 4.24% PRIO3 62.70 ▲ 0.90% SUZB3 52.07 ▼ 0.53% RENT3 29.33 ▼ 0.44% AZZA3 14.23 ▲ 1.86% CSAN3 2.53 ▲ 5.86% RAIZ4 27.57 ▲ 1.73% PCAR3 2.37 ▲ 3.04% GMAT3 3.63 ▲ 2.83% PSSA3 43.71 ▼ 2.63% CVCB3 0.81 — 0.00% POSI3 3.17 — 0.00% SLCE3 16.36 ▼ 1.45% NATU3 5.37 ▼ 0.92% BRKM5 3.03 ▼ 0.66% RANI3 8.50 ▼ 1.51% CSNA3 4.14 ▲ 1.47%
since 2009
Thursday, November 5, 2026

Latin America Mexico

Urban sprawl costs Mexico 1% of GDP – NGO study

By · July 22, 2021 · 2 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – “The sum of the annual expense with families’ displacement and the cost of providing public services may exceed 1% of the country’s GDP each year,” alerted in a statement Pablo Lazo, director of Urban Development and Accessibility of WRI Mexico.

The report “The Cost of Urban Sprawl in Mexico”, presented online yesterday, noted that Mexico’s main cities are at serious risk due to their expansive and disorderly growth and, should the pace continue at its current rate, spending would need to be increased by up to 244%.

1
Urban sprawl in Mexico City.
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The estimate was made based on four factors, namely the costs of housing construction and urbanization, emissions derived from construction, displacement and basic service provision.

The report noted that there is an urgent need for policy change and specific measures to address these four factors.

The document argues that the economic cost of urban sprawl shows that current urban patterns are financially unsustainable for the future, and that urban planning strategies must be tailored to the context and particularities of each city.

The best option to reduce urban costs in the long term is to implement a residential location policy close to employment centers that will more efficiently use land and increase density, the report suggested.

It added that the location policy by itself can generate cumulative savings in annual costs of over 5%, “which would mainly benefit the most vulnerable population, with increased savings over time.”

Finally, the document points out that future planning efforts should be governed by the principles of co-responsibility in urban planning, of focusing institutional support on the most vulnerable areas, and of a comprehensive approach to planning based on an integrated analysis of the impacts and benefits of urban development in the short and long terms.

The study was conducted in eight metropolitan areas including the Valle de Mexico, Guadalajara (Jalisco), Monterrey (Nuevo Leon), Tijuana (Baja California), Reynosa (Tamaulipas), Merida (Yucatan), Tuxtla Gutierrez (Chiapas) and Culiacan (Sinaloa).

Key Facts

— Deep Dive

— For the complete picture, read our in-depth guide: Mexico Economy 2026: GDP, Peso, Nearshoring, Banxico and Trade

Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief · Editorial standards · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.